Game analysis: Memphis Grizzlies at Sacramento Kings
How the Grizzlies Beat the Kings
Memphis paired control of the glass with timely perimeter shooting to stay in front. The Grizzlies overturned a three-point first-quarter deficit with a 42-point second quarter and carried an eight-point lead into halftime. Sacramento eventually pulled even in the fourth, but an 11–0 Memphis run from a tie created the decisive separation, with Ty Jerome scoring during the closing stretch on his way to 31 points and six assists. Memphis overcame three-point lower overall field-goal shooting and six fewer fast-break points.
The biggest reason
Rebounding
ReboundsMEM 54vsSAC 44
Also mattered
+8%3PT shooting
+25%Free-throw shooting
+4Assists
Game flow
When the lead changed
MEM (away)SAC (home)
MEM's biggest lead was 14 points · SAC's was 6 points · 3 lead changes
Quarter-by-quarter momentum
Quarter winners and scoring margin
Q1
MEM25
SAC28
SAC won by 3
Q2Biggest margin
MEM42
SAC31
MEM won by 11
Q3
MEM29
SAC27
MEM won by 2
Q4
MEM27
SAC26
MEM won by 1
Game turning points
Moments identified from the scoring timeline
Final lead changeQ4 · 5:28
Memphis Grizzlies went ahead and did not trail again.
MEM 108–SAC 106
Momentum swings
Key stretches
6 stretches · runs and momentum swings
Q1 · 8:43–45.6
Sacramento Kings21–9stretch
MEM 13 – SAC 7→MEM 22 – SAC 28
Q2 · 11:10–2:00Biggest stretch
Memphis Grizzlies36–21stretch
MEM 27 – SAC 31→MEM 63 – SAC 52
Q3 · 11:01–7:57
Memphis Grizzlies14–5stretch
MEM 69 – SAC 64→MEM 83 – SAC 69
Q3 · 7:57–3:09
Sacramento Kings15–4stretch
MEM 83 – SAC 69→MEM 87 – SAC 84
Q4 · 0.1–5:41
Sacramento Kings20–10stretch
MEM 96 – SAC 86→MEM 106 – SAC 106
Q4 · 5:41–1:10
Memphis Grizzlies17–4stretch
MEM 106 – SAC 106→MEM 123 – SAC 110
Players who shaped the game
Player impact
From the box score
Memphis Grizzlies
MEM
Leading scorerTy Jerome
31PTS4REB6AST1STL0BLK
Impact contributorCameron Boozer
16PTS11REB4AST0STL2BLK
Impact contributorCedric Coward
15PTS11REB2AST1STL0BLK
Sacramento Kings
SAC
Leading scorerZach LaVine
37PTS2REB5AST2STL0BLK
Impact contributorDomantas Sabonis
15PTS15REB3AST2STL0BLK
Impact contributorDarius Acuff Jr.
22PTS3REB7AST0STL1BLK
Team performance
Biggest advantages and setbacks
What the winner did best—and what it overcame
Advantages
Free-throw shootingWinner edge
Memphis Grizzlies had a 25 percentage points edge in free-throw shooting.
MEM 89%SAC 64%
Total reboundsWinner edge
Memphis Grizzlies had a 10 edge in total rebounds.
MEM 54SAC 44
Three-point shootingWinner edge
Memphis Grizzlies had a 8 percentage points edge in three-point shooting.
MEM 38%SAC 30%
Setbacks
StealsOpponent edge
Memphis Grizzlies trailed in steals by 2.
MEM 6SAC 8
Fast-break pointsOpponent edge
Memphis Grizzlies trailed in fast-break points by 6.
MEM 10SAC 16
The numbers behind the win
Evidence
5 signals
Rebounding
Memphis controlled the overall glass, with most of the advantage coming on defensive rebounds.
MEM54
SAC44
Three-point shooting
The Grizzlies held a meaningful perimeter-efficiency advantage despite shooting worse overall from the field.
MEM38%
SAC30%
Free-throw shooting
Memphis converted its opportunities at the foul line substantially more efficiently.
MEM89%
SAC64%
Decisive fourth-quarter run
MEM 11-0
The Grizzlies broke a fourth-quarter tie by scoring 11 unanswered points and Sacramento never regained the lead.
Editorial turning point
Memphis broke a fourth-quarter tie with an 11-0 run
The Grizzlies turned a tie into an 11-point advantage from 5:28 to 3:57, and Sacramento never regained the lead.
This game’s Winning DNA
How Memphis Grizzlies got it done.
The winning formula behind this game.
Memphis Grizzlies
Rebounding
30%
Clutch Execution
30%
3PT Shooting
25%
Superstar Performance
15%
Editorial weights for this game — not fan-vote percentages or official NBA statistics.