Game analysis: Memphis Grizzlies at Golden State Warriors
How the Grizzlies Beat the Warriors
Memphis' late-game execution turned a double-digit deficit into a stunning finish. The Grizzlies trailed by 12 with 3:34 remaining before a 17–0 run carried them into the lead for good. Ty Jerome scored 28 points, while Cameron Boozer added 25 points, 13 rebounds and 6 assists as Memphis recovered after Golden State had controlled much of the second half. The Grizzlies completed the comeback despite committing eight more turnovers and shooting substantially worse at the free-throw line.
The biggest reason
Clutch Execution
Late-game executionMEM 10vsGS 2
Also mattered
+6%Field-goal shooting
+15Fast-break points
+6Rebounds
Game flow
When the lead changed
MEMGS
MEM's biggest lead was 13 points · GS's was 12 points · 14 lead changes
Quarter-by-quarter momentum
Quarter winners and scoring margin
Q1
MEM33
GS34
GS won by 1
Q2
MEM27
GS22
MEM won by 5
Q3Biggest margin
MEM24
GS34
GS won by 10
Q4
MEM27
GS18
MEM won by 9
Game turning points
Moments identified from the scoring timeline
Largest deficitQ4 · 3:47
Memphis Grizzlies trailed by 12 at its deepest point before going on to win.
MEM 94–GS 106
Late-game pressureQ4 · 1:24
The game was within five points late, with Golden State Warriors ahead.
MEM 105–GS 106
Final lead changeQ4 · 20.1
Memphis Grizzlies went ahead and did not trail again.
MEM 108–GS 106
Momentum swings
Key runs
5 runs · 7+ unanswered points
Q1 · 6:52–5:40
Golden State Warriors10–0run
MEM 19 – GS 11→MEM 19 – GS 21
Q2 · 6:55–4:42
Memphis Grizzlies10–0run
MEM 44 – GS 41→MEM 54 – GS 41
Q2 · 2:32–45.0
Golden State Warriors10–0run
MEM 57 – GS 46→MEM 57 – GS 56
Q3 · 3:28–30.7
Golden State Warriors11–0run
MEM 84 – GS 79→MEM 84 – GS 90
Q4 · 3:34–10.2Largest run
Memphis Grizzlies17–0run
MEM 94 – GS 106→MEM 111 – GS 106
Players who shaped the game
Player impact
From the box score
Memphis Grizzlies
MEM
Leading scorerTy Jerome
28PTS2REB5AST1STL0BLK
Impact contributorCameron Boozer
25PTS13REB6AST2STL0BLK
Impact contributorZach Edey
8PTS10REB3AST1STL2BLK
Golden State Warriors
GS
Leading scorerStephen Curry
24PTS3REB4AST0STL0BLK
Impact contributorYaxel Lendeborg
18PTS13REB6AST3STL0BLK
Impact contributorBrandin Podziemski
18PTS2REB3AST3STL1BLK
Team performance
Biggest advantages and setbacks
What the winner did best—and what it overcame
Advantages
Fast-break pointsWinner edge
Memphis Grizzlies had a 15 edge in fast-break points.
MEM 18GS 3
Field-goal shootingWinner edge
Memphis Grizzlies had a 6 percentage points edge in field-goal shooting.
MEM 47%GS 41%
Points off turnoversWinner edge
Memphis Grizzlies had a 9 edge in points off turnovers.
MEM 38GS 29
Setbacks
TurnoversOpponent edge
Memphis Grizzlies committed 8 more turnovers than Golden State Warriors.
MEM 27GS 19
StealsOpponent edge
Memphis Grizzlies trailed in steals by 5.
MEM 7GS 12
Free-throw shootingOpponent edge
Memphis Grizzlies trailed in free-throw shooting by 17 percentage points.
MEM 73%GS 90%
The numbers behind the win
Evidence
5 signals
Late-game execution
Memphis gained a decisive scoring advantage after entering the final 1:49 behind, completing its comeback in the closing minutes.
MEM10
GS2
Overall shooting
The Grizzlies converted their field-goal attempts more efficiently across the game.
MEM47%
GS41%
Fast-break scoring
Memphis held a substantial advantage in transition scoring despite Golden State forcing more turnovers.
MEM18
GS3
Rebounding
The Grizzlies finished with the overall advantage on the glass while both teams collected 18 offensive rebounds.
MEM47
GS41
Editorial turning point
17-0 MEM run from 3:34 to 10.2 of Q4
Memphis erased a 12-point deficit, moved five points ahead and never surrendered the lead afterward.
This game’s Winning DNA
How Memphis Grizzlies got it done.
The winning formula behind this game.
Memphis Grizzlies
Clutch Execution
45%
Superstar Performance
25%
Pace
15%
Rebounding
15%
Editorial weights for this game — not fan-vote percentages or official NBA statistics.
Team Comparison
Memphis Grizzlies111 PTSVSChase CenterGolden State Warriors108 PTS
40-86
FG
34-83
15-39
3PT
14-41
16-22
FT
26-29
47
REB
41
27
AST
23
7
STL
12
7
BLK
6
27
TO
19
The Debate
Start the conversation.
Agree with our breakdown — or see the game differently?